NATSILC: RSA Staff Explains New Policy
Posted by: Lou Diehl
Date Mailed: Wednesday, October 22nd 2003 10:31 AM
Date Mailed: Wednesday, October 22nd 2003 10:31 AM
From: ForCompliance@aol.com Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 20:00:36 EDT Subject: RSA STAFF EXPLAINS NEW POLICY For those who doubt the veracity of the warnings written about in the posting at http://www.dimenet.com/hotnews/cgi/getlink.cgi?3431R here is an example of the many facts upon which it was based. In response to a query about who can and can't vote for the center director who Title VII requires as a member selected by his or her peers, a Region V staffperson wrote the following: "The Rehab Act draws no connection between the network of centers and the election of a center representative to the SILC. The law talks about the SILC having at least one member that is a director of a center for independent living chosen by the center directors in a state The requirement for centers to participate in the election of the center representative to the SILC is that the center must meet the definition of a center contained in the Rehab Act at section 702. There is no requirement that the center also meet the standards and assurances set forth in section 725 of the Act in order to vote on the center representative to the SILC. However, a center must meet the definition of a center in the Act and must meet the standards and assurances to be a member of the network of centers." Here's the reason the query was sent. As part of its report of findings in Indiana, RSA noted that none of the membership required by Title VII for the SILC had been appointed - not the DSU representative, no one from other agencies providing services to people with disabilities, and not a representative from the state's centers. Note: Although several persons self-identified as being the center representative, no one has ever been appointed by the Governor for that purpose. Emma Sullivan's election nearly three years ago was rejected by the former SILC chair, saying "she's a good person and her heart's in the right place, but she shouldn't be forced onto the council." Six entities in Indiana have been receiving Part C funding through RSA after having been selected through the appropriate review processes. Only five of those were recognized by the state until last year. Four have formed the Indiana Federation of Centers for Independent Living. The other two have chosen to collaborate instead with three other entities who were selected by the state's Department of Administration (neither the SILC nor the DSU were involved in that process) to receive SSA/VR funds and be deemed as "Centers." This was done without benefit of peer review or determination that they meet the standards and assurances that most have assumed must apply to anyone who calls themselves a center. Note: many in IL believe that those three were funded as "rewards" to previous council members who "paid their dues" by doing the state's bidding, and question whether or not they are operating in accordance with generally accepted practices for CILs. For example, one claims that they don't "do advocacy," one operates an apartment complex, one has a director who doesn't believe that anyone should be allowed to hold up signs at a SILC meeting. Meanwhile, at least five other groups have been referenced by SILC members as "centers," even though most don't even have an address and one operates out of a sheltered workshop. One of them is funded by a veterans organization that runs out of one of the federally funded centers, and its 'director' is the daughter-in-law of the SILC's treasurer, who works for the director of the federally funded center. So. The question is, how many centers may participate in the process by which a representative of the Centers is selected? Six? Nine? Fourteen? To distribute items to the DIMENET National Statewide Independent Living Council Mailing List prepare them as text in the body of a mail message with no file attachments and mail them too: silc@tripil.com To subscribe or unsubscribe send mail to majordomo@tripil.com with the following in the body of the mail message subscribe silc OR unsubscribe silc The National Statewide Independent Living Council Mailing List Archive can be viewed at http://www.dimenet.com/silc/ -- TNET Mail-To-News Gateway Version - 1.6 For information about this gateway send email to programs AT tnet.com

