CONNECTION: THE ADA AND RSAS ACTIONS
Posted by: teresatorres@everybodycounts.org
Date Mailed: Sunday, July 22nd 2007 01:42 PM
Date Mailed: Sunday, July 22nd 2007 01:42 PM
In 1990, when Congress passed the Americans with Disabilities Act, they found that the historical isolation and segregation of millions of people with disabilities was a serious and pervasive social problem. They recognized that discrimination against these individuals persisted in critical areas of life, and that those who experienced such discrimination often had no legal recourse. Congress found that individuals with disabilities continually encountered various forms of discrimination, which included outright intentional exclusion and overprotective rules and policies. They found that individuals with disabilities had been subjected to a history of purposeful unequal treatment, and relegated to a position of political powerlessness in our society. Congress knew that the discrimination and institutional bias that Congress found to exist in 1990 extends to state and federal government agencies. We believe that it still does. We certainly know that it does in the state of Indiana. We also know, without question, that the Rehabilitative Services Administration of the U.S. Department of Education. They have acknowledged it just as repeatedly as they have told us that they're not going to do anything about it. RSA has told us that our recent review was the result of random selection, and perhaps that's true, although we have information that give sus good reason to believe otherwise. But it's no secret that we have been actively demanding that RSA do something about the ongoing fraud and corruption in this state, because not only has it hurt not our centers, our immediate constituencies, but people with disabilities across the state - indeed across the country. Twenty-five years ago, in a report published by Justin Dart, Jr., Lex Frieden warned of changes to come, changes which he said would result in most Centers for Independent Living turning into service providers, becoming little more than part of the establishment they were intended to improve or replace. Part of his concern was that the federal government would impose stricter controls, and try to standardize a program that was intended to be a reflection of local communities of people with disabilities, who would be empowered to impact changes needed at state and local levels. In a report funded through the U.S. Department of Education, ILRU's Quentin Smith said that Centers became less aggressive in advocating for significant changes when they feared retaliation that might include loss of funding. We believe that what these prophets and visionaries warned us all about has come to pass, not just here in Indiana, but in other states as well, and that RSA is seemingly powerless to do anything to do anything about it. Even more troubling is that it appears they are uninterested in even giving it a try. Everybody Counts has persistently advocated, truly advocated, not just by writing letters but by taking action, for changes in archaic state systems that provide some of the best examples for the reason that the ADA was written in the first place. The record clearly shows that we, along with anyone else who is fighting for real change, have been subjected to retaliation that under Title VII, should require the RSA Commissioner to act. We can't even get a phone call back to explain why nobody is doing anything about the blatant fraud and corruption going on in Indiana's IL program. It has been said that what is happening in this state is the best example of the worst that can happen when the federal government fails to provide adequate oversight of programs that Congress has created with the best of intentions. We believe that this is a sad truth, and that something must be done about it, immediately. After they passed the ADA, Congress passed amendments to the Rehabilitation Act which created Statewide Councils on Independent Living, which were supposed to be consumer-controlled, autonomous and not subject to control or influence by any government entity. In Indiana, in flagrant violation of Title VII and the intent of Congress, the SILC is under the total control of state government. RSA knows that this is true. We have provided indisputable evidence that this is true. SILCs were supposed to be a means by which people with disabilities could influence state government to make the kinds of changes necessary to eradicate the institutional discrimination Congress had recognized. In Indiana, any individuals or organizations who advocate for systemic change are subjected to blatant retaliation. In our case, that has cost our constituency nearly 5 million dollars in funding earmarked for our people. RSA knows that this is true. We have provided indisputable evidence that this is true. These councils were supposed to provide leadership, to empower people with disabilities with information and access to decision makers. In Indiana, the council is made up of individuals who have absolutely no interest in informing or empowering anybody other than themselves. RSA knows that this is true. We have provided indisputable evidence that this is true. Our agency, and citizens with disabilities from throughout the state of Indiana, continue to report ongoing fraud and corruption within Indiana's independent living program. RSA knows that this is true. We have provided indisputable evidence that this is true. But RSA has told us, repeatedly, that they don't even want to talk about this situation, let alone do anything about it. The report of findings from that review, issued in January of 2004, clearly showed that the state of Indiana has openly violated not only Title VII, but the ADAthat the state of Indiana had no intention of coming into compliance with those laws, and had been falsely certifying to the federal oversight agency for a very long time. Everybody Counts has paid dearly for RSA's inability or unwillingness to take appropriate action against those who are flaunting federal law. Our history dates back to 1981, the International Year of Disabled Persons. Since our incorporation 1986, we have worked with thousands of people with disabilities of all ages, shapes, sizes and colors. We are all very proud of what we have managed to achieve together, while trying to survive with less than minimal funding and even less cooperation or support from those charged by federal law to provide it. In following federal law and meeting the intent of Congress, we have openly and steadfastly persisted in demanding that the state cease its institutional bias against people with disabilities. That hasn't made the state too happy, nor those who are being paid off to support the status quo. We have advocated, and in some cases, been involved in litigation, for changes in Indiana's long term care policiesconducted workshops for local law enforcementcollaborated with local agencies and disability organizationshelped local business to follow the ADAprovided information, referral and support for persons with a wide range of disabilitiesand created a new website being utilized by many thousands of people as an information and organization resource. But we have only scratched the surface, and must be afforded the due process to which we are entitled so that we can do what we are supposed to do. RSA is condoning ongoing travesties not only against our organization, but against others that are willing to fight for their rights, and indeed against citizens with disabilities throughout the state of Indiana. In the process, they are setting the stage for what was supposed to be a movement of the people, by the people and for the people, to become anything but, thereby sadly making the predicions of heroes like Justin Dart, Jr. and Lex Frieden all too true.

